View Single Post
  #5  
Old June 20th 17, 06:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Letter to the FAA

At 12:56 11 June 2017, Walt Connelly wrote:

[_1_ Wrote:
;948656']There are treatments for PTSD that don't involve the

FAA.

The odds of anything rational and positive coming from

involving .GOV is
really poor.


Please tell me what treatment is available to a dead tow pilot who

tried
to release a glider with a Schweizer hook and died as a result of a

well
documented flaw of that release?

Walt




--
Walt Connelly


From another thread it has been confirmed that in Australia low tow
is the standard position behind the tug.
Does using low tow offer a solution to the ring jam with a Schweizer
hook given that there is almost no chance of glider getting too high
behind the tug?
Tug upsets should be almost unknown in Australia, are they? If they
are it would seen that we could easily increase tug safety at no cost
whatsoever and do away with the need for expensive modification to
tugs.
Is there a cogent argument against using low tow? The only
difference that I can see, from a tuggies point of view is that he will
find it more difficult to see the glider. Is that important?
Of course the reverse applies, the glider can always see the tug.