View Single Post
  #9  
Old July 6th 04, 10:15 PM
tim gueguen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brett" wrote in message
...
"tim gueguen" wrote in message
news:kqzGc.969780$Pk3.439395@pd7tw1no...

"Brett" wrote in message
. ..
"tim gueguen" wrote:

"Bill & Susan Maddux" wrote in message
om...
The terrorist would like nothing better than perform an act of

terror
to
change the out come of an American Election like they did in

Spain.
I
believe that if Gore had won in 2000, 9-11 would have been deal

with
the
same manor as the first Twin Towers attack in 93. (NOTHING).

********.

The Embassy bombings in 1998 didn't generate much of a response from

the
Clinton Administration (remember Gore was part of it)


Which was not a direct attack on United States territory,


A US Embassy is considered US territory so it would be a direct attack.

But not to Joe Q. Public, and certainly not the way an attack on New York
is.

didn't cause
billions of dollars of damage to New York City and the Pentagon, and

didn't
kill 3000 plus US citizens in their own country.


so your comment should
be directed at you, since the Maddux comment is probably closer to the

truth
than yours.


If you really think a Gore admin wouldn't have gone out and stomped on

the
Taliban


A couple of cruise missiles directed at nearly empty training camps.

They would have done a lot more than that. They would have had no choice
given public opinion.

as the Bush admin did you need to take those partisan blinders off.


The person with the blinders on is you.


Got it backwards. Looking at US foreign policy from the outside one doesn't
see huge differences in behaviour between the 2 parties.

tim gueguen 101867