At 14:09 12 July 2017, wrote:
On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:59:52 PM UTC-4, Steve Leonard wrote:
Yeah, I know I should "buy a new logger". But, I fly old sailplanes.
:-=
) Anyone had success uploading a file from a Model 20 and getting a
valid
=
score? I am 0 for 3. The first two, I wrote off to too few satellites a
c=
ouple of times during the flight. Didn't have that issue today, but
still
=
a big red V.
=20
I am using the same conversion program I used last year, and it says it
i=
s making a valid file. It worked fine last year, but doesn't now. Maybe
t=
hey would like me better if I gave them money? And, please, no "Use
Skylin=
es" comments.
=20
Suggestions welcome.
=20
Steve Leonard

If flying 30 plus year old gliders is no big deal then why the sarcasm
over=
20 year old instruments? Also it seems especially when it comes to
badges
=
that we have tighter security the our state department. Why can't any IGC
f=
ile be OK....are we really afraid that people will cheat the system? I
gues=
s with all that prize money people will do anything.=20

Accept all IGC files and let pilots be on their honor.

Dennis

The Cambridge M10 (from which came the M20) was only secure in the .CAI
file, the .IGC file was not secure, something Dave Ellis promised to fix,
but never did. The M10 was the first, later recorders all had secure .IGC
files.

We Learn.

But to assume that all pilots are honourable has been proved to be wrong,
and we only know about the people who have been caught.