View Single Post
  #52  
Old July 10th 04, 11:36 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Date: 7/10/2004 5:23 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

(B2431) wrote in message
...
From: (robert arndt)
Date: 7/8/2004 4:13 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Tank Fixer wrote in message
ink.net...
In article ,
on 5 Jul 2004 02:16:43 -0700,
robert arndt
attempted to say .....

http://www.hk-usa.com/pages/military...bines/xm8.html

Check out the head-to-head comparison. HK rules!


from the manufacuers web site ???


hahahahahahaahhaa


No need actually since most HK small arms EXCEED all US Federal and
Military standards, Jackass.

Rob


You STILL haven't provided an independant cite. Do you have one?


Why don't you just call the US Army's ARDEC, NJ facility and ask
them... or perhaps the Secret Service's Armory, or any Police/HRUs in
the nation that equip with HK, Walther, Mauser, and Erma.

Rob


YOU made a claim about the XM-8 it's up to you to prove your point using data
other than that provided by the manufaturer. Instead you mention Mauser,
Walther and Erma.

You still haven't proven your point despite several of us asking you to provide
independant and verifiable cites. Don't was us to to your research for you. You
made the claim so YOU have to prove it.


Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired