View Single Post
  #8  
Old August 25th 17, 04:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Shaun Murdoch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default FES_vs_Gas_Engine_–_Finding_a_Thermal?

With the FES, the vario still shows sensible readings but will show
positive proportional to the power you've put in if the motor is
running. So you'll see climb rate going up in thermals (and down in
sink), and you can sort of guess there's a thermal there - reduce
power, see what happens. There's so little penalty to stopping the
motor and re-starting anyway, just whirl a little knob.

Now, if the FES controller and the vario (both LX) talked to each
other and we could have the vario FES-compensated, that'd be
pretty cool..!

You could even imagine a "get me home" mode which tried to
maintain altitude by adjusting power - so you could slow in lift and
extend the range.


At 20:28 24 August 2017, V1 wrote:
While reading the FES article in June Soaring (yes, I=E2=80=99m

behind in
m=
y reading), I noticed the author=E2=80=99s comment about

searching for a
th=
ermal while FES was running, then shutting down FES as he

started to
climb.=
This is a topic I don=E2=80=99t recall seeing discussed in any

FES vs gas
=
comparisons.

In my Solo-powered Ventus 2cxT, my experience has been that the

vibration
(=
and possibly disturbed airflow) caused so much wild gyration in the

vario
r=
eadings that it seemed pointless to try to determine if I was flying

into
r=
ising air, so I just climbed first, then shut down the engine and

started
a=
thermal search.

My question =E2=80=93 do others have experience to share about

their
abilit=
y to find thermals while a sustainer or self-launcher (either gas or
electr=
ic) was running? If electric has an advantage here, this could

reduce the
r=
un-time needed and conserve =E2=80=9Cfuel=E2=80=9D.=20

- Frank