View Single Post
  #3  
Old July 11th 04, 03:14 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DJFawcett26" wrote in message
...

Actually, the major driver for the inverted gull was finding a way to make
clearance for the HUGE prop so runways and carrier decks didn't get

chopped up.
All the drag reduction trades and benefits were a natural fall out of the
design.

Keep in mind, the wings could have been put have been put at the 90 and

270
position and achieved the same benefit. But the prop would have went

chop,
chop.


The F6F had the same engine and similar propeller but didn't go chop chop
without the inverted gull wing.