View Single Post
  #7  
Old July 19th 04, 12:35 AM
phil hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 22:14:55 -0400, Peter Kemp wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:42:52 +0100, (phil hunt)
wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:44:31 +0100, Paul J. Adam wrote:
In any case, the F-35 isn't going into production until the 2010s
and I doubt if it'll be operational with the RN in much less than 10
years. And until then it's pretty much unthinkable that the surface
fleet would go anywhere against any country with any significant air
capability -- even tuppeny-ha'penny ********s like Sudan would
represent significant dangers to an RN without air cover.


Sudan? Air force strike force consisting of around 10 MiG 21 knock
offs and 3 (count em) MiG 23?

I think even without Harrier GR.9/A armed with Sidewinders the
T22/23/42 should be able to handle them.


What if they are armed with anti-ship missiles? They would certainly
be able to get off the missiles before reaching Sea Wolf range, and
Sea Dart didn't do particularly well against Exocets in 1982.


--
"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: zen19725 at zen dot co dot uk)