"Ed Rasimus" wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:03:43 -0400, "Brett"
wrote:

"Ed Rasimus" wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:22:04 -0400, "Brett"
wrote:

"Ed Rasimus" wrote:

Sorry, Mike, but if your bud is telling the truth about flying 76's
for Delta, he's doing $4K/week not month. Not even the yesterday
hire
FE on a Fokker is making as little as$48K/year.

Those flying for Delta Connection probably do.

Well, just to ping you, since you ping me on equipment below, Delta
Connection isn't operating 76's.

Except my remark here was related to the comment about "yesterday hire FE
on
a Fokker" who do probably make a lot less than $48K.

So, it's gonna be that way, huh?

I didn't mean it to sound "that way".

Dunno if Delta flies Fokkers at all,

They don't.

but the only Fokkers I know about in US service don't have FEs at all.

I don't believe any of the major US carriers have any current equipment now
that actually has FE stations.

I was simply suggesting that $4k/month is a mighty low wage for any
driver at a major carrier.

Well I know one Air Force Major who left the service a few years ago to take
a position at US Airways and his initial salary from what he said was going
to be good deal lower than his Air Force pay.
The local Atlanta newspaper had an article earlier this year about Delta
managements demands for pay concessions by the pilots and the quoted
starting salaries for pilots at Delta (not the Connection) was $45,000 (most
of those would have already have been laid off at the time of the article).
For the senior pilots (ANG trained pilots who after their initial training
commitment could start work at any airline, would normally have the longest
time with the company) the pay and benefits were excellent, but the large
number of those pilots taking retirement in the last 18 months is one of the
reasons (to guarantee their lump sum pension payout incase Delta takes
Chapter 11) why Delta's quoted loss was $2B this week.