View Single Post
  #7  
Old July 21st 04, 04:39 PM
Harry Andreas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Scott Ferrin
wrote:

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:16:47 +0100, "Paul J. Adam"
wrote:

In message , Scott Ferrin
writes
How are you getting the firing solution? Radar? Put out many megawatts
of coherent microwaves and hope that a notional "low probability of
intercept" radar is actually a "zero PoI", because Typhoon has a rather
good RHAWS of its own?


This brings up something I've been wondering. I don't know if this is
urban legend or what. Supposedly workstations dealing with classified
materials have to have the monitors shielded so signals can't be
picked up out the back? I'm wondering, when it comes to your typical
fighter if these same signals are shielded. It seems to me there
would be other sources of electrical "noise" than just an actively
transmitting radar or radio.


See
MIL-STD-461 Requirements For The Control Of Electromagnetic Interference
Characteristics Of Subsystems And Equipment
MIL-STD-464 Electromagnetic Environmental Effects, Requirements for Systems
EIA/IS-647 Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic
Interference Emissions and Susceptibility Characteristics of Equipment
Intended to Operate in Severe Electromagnetic Environments

some of the words we live by.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur