In , on 08/20/2004
at 12:35 PM, IBM said:

Steve Hix wrote in
:

In article qn7Vc.9852$zO3.3508@trndny05, wrote:

In , on 08/19/2004
at 11:54 AM, Steve Hix said:

In article 7QYUc.6516$_w.5361@trndny04, wrote:

Nonsense. -- If the F-102 was so dangerous to fly -- then how
come it was so easy to rig with automatic controls that could take
it off and fly it as drone? -- That's where most of them went --
target practice in combat with our best -- all under remote
control. E.g., that means it was *easy to fly and *stable. (Or
course you should have known that before now, since duba did it).

Drone target aircraft are not flown all that aggressively most
of the time. Certainly not as manoeuvering missile bait a la
Top Gun if only because situational awareness as regards your
opponent would be difficult to maintain.
Are you truly as clueless as you seem to be, LeTurd?


--Your generalizations give away your trolling.

PS: NORAD missions during the time bush was in -- never included Top Gun
flying. It was all radar guided intercepts. E.g., if you can steer the
thing, you can do it.

-- Don't come back until your the brains to play with the big boys. --
That won't happen soon.



[snip]

bush didn't do something dangerous and daring.

Dangerous yes but thats inherent in the job.

You were wrong about the F-102 being trivially-simple to fly, too.

That and much else.


What you mean is I tell truths is simple words -- that make you upset. Its
because you're lying to yourself -- in fact you can't stand yourself --
but you don't have the discipline to just just up when you know you
should.







IBM

_________________________________________________ ______________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source