On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 8:52:22 PM UTC-5, Darryl Ramm wrote:
Things seem to be getting a little confused here. FlightAware is a service that uses a distributed network of 1090ES ADS-B receivers and flight data sourced though some NAS operators/data service providers, some of their data products also include 1090ES ADS-B data from Aireon satellites (that service is still rolling out AFAIK).

There is really no such thing as a "FlightAware equipped" aircraft. FlightAware is ultimately just tracking 1090ES Out equipped aircraft and in some cases just aircraft equipped with a transponder via other NAS provided surveillance. There is no way for FlightAware to transmit data to FLARM equipped aircraft or visa versa. But combining those signals on a single display on the ground is just software, and for example what PowerFLARM (with the ADS-B Option) kinda already does... combining data for local FLARM and 1090ES Out equipped traffic.

BTW it was Aireon sourced 1090ES Out data that helped convince some of the regulators to ground the B737 Max.


On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 3:07:14 PM UTC-7, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:04:15 -0700, Paul Remde wrote:

The posts recommending the use of OGN are very interesting. The
customer I'm working with is not interested in having the aircraft
positions available over the internet, but our soaring club is.

Getting our club members to invest in PowerFLARM units or ADS-B Out has
been tough. The OGN Trackers look like a nice, low-cost alternative.

OGN in its original form was just a network of software-defined receivers
running on RaspberryPis that picked up FLARM transmissions, and passed
the data from them over the Internet to a webserver. This is what you
connect to on order to see all FLARM-equipped gliders and aircraft in
range of the network of receivers.

Since then a similar network, FlightAware, has appeared. It works in a
similar way to FLARM but it not compatible with it, but links have been
set up so that its now possible to co-locate OGN and FlightAware ground
stations and cross-link them so that, IIRC, FLARM traffic is broadcast to
FlightAware equipped aircraft and vice versa.

However, since they are transmitters, wouldn't a radio license be
required? Also, wouldn't F.C.C. approval be needed for any devices?

AFAIK its still quite possible to operate a pure OGN network with all
ground stations in receive-only mode.

OGN is only practical because, although a typical FLARM system only has
an operating radius of 4-5 km, an OGN receiver with a decent, well-placed
antenna can track FLARM-equipped gliders over a much larger distance,
typically 30km or so.

Go he http://live.glidernet.org around midday in the UK or Europe
to see what the system looks like when gliders are operating. Or look at
NZ or Australia about 12 hours earlier/later.


--
Martin | martin at
Gregorie | gregorie dot org

PilotAware? https://pilotaware.com/