"Michael Wise" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

Bush visited a lot of places (all of which coincidentally supported
him)
during his campaign and after his entry into office...but yet couldn't
find the time to visit the largest city and the financial capitol of
this country (NYC) until after it was attacked.

What a joke. I'm not sure if you've noticed, but this country is fairly
large.
If Bush had taken time to visit all the places you want him to, you
would
have
claimed he was neglecting his duties at the White House.


We don't need that to make that claim true. Nobody is saying he should
visit everywhere...but don't you find it odd for a sitting president to
not make even a short stop in the LARGEST city of the country he is
stewarding?

No.

We're not talking Topeka here. He also rarely comes to the
largest state in his country and has never set foot in SF.

Why should he go to Alaska very often?
And not setting foot in San Fran is, well, only good taste.

We've seen the pattern from Day 1: he snubs the areas of the country
which voted against him. A president needs to rise above juvenile
pettiness and represent everybody....not just the people who think he's
not an idiot.

Ah, he should run around kissing up to those who didn't vote for
him the first time so that they might do so the next time. Like
a democrat would?