"BOB" wrote in message ...
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
ink.net:


"forge" wrote in message
...
In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

Not that y'know, he's actually going to ****ing DO anything. He just
keeps saying "we need to stop these 527 groups."


What would you have him do?

What everyone's bloody ASKING him to - say he doesn't support
what SBVT is doing. That's all.


They've already pointed out that there's no connection between the Bush
campaign and the SBVT ads.

What? Where have you been? Check out the news.

Then you should have no problem providing a source.





He still hasn't actually said that, he just keeps
saying "we need to stop them all" without any specifics.


Doesn't "we need to stop them all" include the SBVT ads? You want him to
condemn just the ads that are anti-Kerry, not the ads that are anti-Bush,
even though 7/8 of the 527 group ads are anti-Bush?

I say stop all that are lies.

Why are the anti-Kerry groups less entitled to free speech than the
anti-Bush groups?

Because the anti-Kerry groups are lying for Bush?

Provide proof that Bush is behind any lies.