On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 9:03:43 AM UTC-4, krasw wrote:
tiistai 3. lokakuuta 2017 14.57.45 UTC+3 Muttley kirjoitti:
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 7:30:07 PM UTC+1, Paul T wrote:
http://www.fai.org/igc-our-sport/handicaps
So many misplaced handicaps its a joke. Whoever came up with this
list was clearly smoking some illegal substance at the time.
May be you should read this first
http://static.skysight.io/hc.pdf
Document on how they arrived at the changed Handicaps
1. Let's make a fancy computer software and calculate handicaps based on old crappy idaflieg measurements (304 vs. Mosquito!) and weather model.
2. Hmm... Computer generatend handicap spread is too large. Let's make it, shall we say, umm... 70% instead.
3. Done
Very scientific.
If you give a empty list of glider types to 100 competition pilots and ask them to individually write down their opionion of fair handicaps, you can create a averaged list that is fair to everyone (and you will be surprised how everyone will end up with same handicaps). Fair handicaps are actually quite obvious, no reason to use this kind of shoddy pseudoscience.
If the objective is to drive club class to an ASW-20 dominated club class, the exercise should be successful.
best,
Evan Ludeman / T8