" jls" wrote in message . ..
Well, I think you're correct: Garmin selling to retailers and requiring
them to set minimum retail prices as a condition of selling to them is not a
violation of the Sherman Act. It's not a violation either for us who
consider the practice to be sleazy to shun Garmin like it is a skunk either.

Absolutely! But if only a few of us shun Garmin it will have little or no
effect on their policy. As I said earlier too bad UPS Technologies ceased
to exist as an alternative to Garmin. Until a viable competitor comes along
Garmin will continue to reap the profits of their success and mandate
uniform minimum pricing from their dealers.

GaryP