View Single Post
  #65  
Old January 17th 08, 12:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Rich Ahrens[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 404
Default Phrase "landing runway" vs. "cleared to land"

Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:54 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Nope, it's how reasonable it might be to expect to see he runway and
munuever the airplane to a landing form the MAP or DH.
You're nto going to be able to do that safely with 1/8 from 200' or
thereabouts.
1/8 mile is pretty ****ing small! That's Cat 3a minima.

I can't

think of any reason why this would not be. A typical GA plane may be
stopped on the runway before a 747 touches down. I think vis
requirements, in general, for GA planes are a bit bogus, at least with
regard to precision approaches.

Hand flown, you would have a lot of airplanes crashed into the approach
lights.
An excepetional pilot would be able to do it most of the time, though.
most of the time.

And I've done a LOT of instruments in singles and light twins. 1/4 is
reasonablem but 1/8. no.


Maybe this is different to me because I live in a fog valley.


Oh, you don't ever see fog at home, do you, Bertie? :-)