View Single Post
  #75  
Old February 21st 05, 11:04 PM
Evan Carew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

JC,

For what its worth, the previously described PC104 486 based system was
used by my company to controll a filter system & write to an X display
at the same time running Linux. That system only had 128MB of RAM & that
might have been too much. All applications ran from RAM.

The problem with X apps that run on Linux is that when they are
developed with a toolkit such as Motif or GNOME, you end up including
quite a lot of baggage along with the X app. One way to solve this is to
search for a "light" toolkit or to simply write your app in plain X
yourself. People often say of Such apps "Hey your X app really starts
fast!" That being said, you should not be surprised when X sucks 50% of
the performance of your CPU up on such a box.

On my production unit, the X Application was the only one running &
didn't need a desktop. Under the hood, my drivers supplied the needed
data to the X app. Hopefully, it goes without saying that the kernel was
a custom striped down version with my drivers & very little else.

Evan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCGmkWpxCQXwV2bJARAgFMAKC9u8jXMDfDqNQ60wh+rx flGNn/XgCfQNeV
0QqkahRlAra3uhd6QPNS5xw=
=xcmq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----