Thread
:
Parachute Required by Type Certificate
View Single Post
#
2
April 27th 09, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Nyal Williams[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 259
Parachute Required by Type Certificate
The US FARs require a 'chute if the manufacturer's Pilot's Operating
Handbook says it is required. The question is why the manufacturers
require it; it could be that the seat pan is designed to fit a parachute
and they don't supply a proper cushion. Or in otherwords, what is the
real meaning of "necessary?" This becomes even more curious in the case
of the PW-5; its POH is a translation and only the original text might
explain that.
I think you are stuck with what the manufacturer says regardless of why he
says it.
At 21:32 27 April 2009,
wrote:
Just a curiosity...
I fly a Slingsby T59-D Kestrel 19 in Canada. According to my Type
Certificate (G-93), a "back type parachute" is listed as required
equipment, along with basic instruments. So, a parachute must be worn
in order to fly the aircraft or I'm in violation of the TC. (The U.S.
TC for my ship is G27EU and does not require a parachute)
So, how many other aircraft out there have a legal requirement for the
pilot to wear a parachute?
Why would a CAA require some aircraft to have a parachute and others
not? Any rules as to which aircraft?
Odd things to be thinking about, but I haven't started flying yet this
season, and I'm getting antsy!
Nyal Williams[_2_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Nyal Williams[_2_]
Find all threads started by Nyal Williams[_2_]