View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 23rd 03, 10:33 AM
Tim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"CivetOne" wrote in message
...
Hi Tim,

When Hughes Tool Co., Aircraft Division experimented with the OH-6A to

make it
very quiet, the engineers knew that a big source of noise was the tail

rotor.
To make the tail rotor quieter, they decided to increase the blade area

and
decrease the rpm. The most convenient (i.e., least costly) method was to
simply add another set of teetering blades to the tail rotor.

In addition to the addition of more blades, Hughes engineers experimented

with
blade phasing to decrease the noise level as much as possible. As I

remember,
the phasing they decided upon was about 45 deg.

When the AH-64 Apache came along, the Hughes engineers incorporated what

they
had learned from the OH-6A development work. The same basic design for

the
tail rotor of the quiet OH-6A was incorporated into the Apache design; two
pairs of teetering rotor blades. The same concept was used on the

4-bladed
tail rotor option on the MD 500D, E, and FF series of helicopters.

The one additional requirement for the Apache was to fit into a C-130

transport
without disassembling the rotors. In order to meet this requirement, the

tail
rotor blade spacing was changed to the 30 deg spacing you found. The

noise
signature suffered a litttle bit, but the transportaion requirement was

met.

Thanks for that. Just got to work out how to incorporate that into an R/C
replica...


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.529 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003