HOWEVER

You continue to represent a certain table as "The nationwide Popular Vote"
when the nationwide popular vote isn't even counted.

That's a lie; or at least misrepresenting "X" as "Y."

Steve Swartz


"Jack G" wrote in message
news:fG22d.10285$iS2.5488@trnddc09...
Which was exactly the point I tried to make to ART. Believe me, I know
how
the President is elected.

Jack G.
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"Jack G" wrote in message
news:dA02d.6092$MS1.2252@trnddc02...
I never mentioned Electoral votes in my post. The topic of Art's post
was
the popular vote.

Then you are wasting your breath--the nationwide popular vote does not
mean
squat.

Brooks


Jack G.
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"Jack G" wrote in message
news:h302d.8184$5t4.4608@trnddc01...
From http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/2000presgeresults.htm

Popular Vote:

Bush: 50,456,002 47.87%
Go 50,999,897 48.38%

Looks like more to me!

Uhmmm...I believe his point is in regards to the votes that actually
count--the Electoral College ones. ISTR Bush got more of those?

Brooks


Jack G.

"Leslie Swartz" wrote in message
...
Do your homework.


"Jack G" wrote in message
news:FVO1d.3647$g9.70@trnddc06...
Art, can you name the other presidents who were elected with
less
than
a
majority of the popular vote? Or have you forgotten them?

Jack G.