View Single Post
  #3  
Old July 25th 03, 02:36 PM
Allan9
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is not regulatory but informational.
Look at Appendix A to 7110.65
Al

"No Spam" wrote in message
...
Aaron,

It was an FAA observation ride at the end of IOE. Type rating was obtained
in the sim. The observer is our POI and is as anal as they come. Asking

for
a reference would have been my response, but I wasn't there. I haven't had

a
chance to ask one of our check airmen about it yet.

No Spam
Part 121 B717



On 7/11/03 00:52, in article , "Aaron
Kahn" wrote:

What type of checkride was it? I would have asked the inspector to

identify
the regulation that was infracted, or identify how the action

compromised
safety.

It's true the controllers have expectations (as mentioned by Joe) but I
don't think that in and of itself constitutes a bust. But, then again,

the
FAA isn't asking me.

Aaron
part 121 B1900

"No Spam" wrote in message
...
On 7/3/03 07:12, in article
,
" wrote:



No Spam wrote:

The AIM says to give ATC a call if you can't maintain a rate of climb

or
descent of at least 500 fpm. I thought I read somewhere that ATC

expects a
rate of 500 to 1500 fpm until within 1000 feet of level-off altitude.
Anybody know where this guidance is? Is it different for climbs and
descents?

TIA,

No Spam

AIM 4-4-9 d...read it, you'll find you don't quite have it right.

Thanks, Joe. I was including the word "minimum" in my search and only

came
up with paragraph 5-3-3.

Now, do you have any idea what "optimum rate" means? Do you know where

it
might say that descents must be at least 1000 fpm?

What started this is our anal POI busted one of our pilots for not
descending at a rate of at least 1000 fpm. When ATC directs an early
descent, our FMS will descend at 750 fpm until it intercepts the

standard
descent profile. In the case of our pilot, he didn't override the FMS

to
increase the rate to at least 1000 fpm and the POI busted him for it.

No Spam