Wow. It's the brain-dead moron who took the beating of his life on the wood
species thread and was too chicken to even respond.

Now he's back here, spitting up his usual crap.

This is a pattern with Moron from NC. He jumps in slinging personal attacks
completely unprovoked and yet he doesn't know the first thing about the
subject.

If I was to ask him what the efficiencies are of cogged and poly-v belts
would he be able to give an answer? Of course not. Just watch and see. Yet
here he is badmouthing a person in a most uncalled for manner.

What a pathetic loser. Gets his pathetic little rocks off by jumping on
these lists and acting out some kind of alter ego -- a poser, a
substance-free poser.

Regards,

Gordon.



"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Gordon Arnaut" wrote

The advantage of the poly-v over a cogged (synchronous) belt is that they
naturally dampen torsional spikes, by means of slippage. Another plus is
that the pulleys can be considerably lighter.

Gordon

Get a clue. Compare efficencies between a cogged belt sized for 100 HP,
and the necessary number of v-belts for the same 100 HP. Next, take that
percentage of power wasted for each, and calculate how much heat will be
produced by each of these two systems.

Should be no problem for a math wiz like yourself.
--
Jim (barking, foaming mad) in NC

First rule of getting out of a hole. Quit digging.

Second rule for getting out of a hole. Leave.