Cherokee 235 vs Trinidad vs Comanche
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Jay Honeck wrote:
After 1973, there is simply no better fixed-gear aircraft than a
-235/-236. It is the ultimate expression of the Cherokee line, and we
have found very few mission parameters that our Pathfinder won't meet
or exceed.
It depends on your mission. I'll take a 182 over a 235 any day.
Matt
There are several performance measures where the PA-235/236 generally
trounces the C-182.
The first is price. The Pipers are $10k less expensive due to Cessna having
more brand loyalists. $10k buys a lot of avgas, a decent panel update, or a
very nice paintjob and a few aftermarket speed mod's.
A second is useful load. All of the Pipers have a ~1400 lb useful load,
which is anywhere between 100 and 400 pounds more than various iterations of
the 182.
A third is that the Piper has a Lycoming engine, whereas the Cessna has a
Continental. Lycomings tend to need less top end work than Continentals.
The speeds of the various models are comparable. The Cessnas probably have
a higher ceiling and can get in and out of shorter fields.
For me, the Piper is the clear winner, but if you're playing at being a bush
pilot or flying in high density altitudes, the Cessna may be a better
choice.
KB
|