April 24th 04, 06:40 AM
|
|
Thus my predicament. How "blended" does it have to be to count as a part of
the wing?
"Blueskies" wrote in message
. com...
The B2 fails the no fuselage definition I would think, blended fuselage
maybe but not no fuselage.
--
Dan D.
http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html
.
"Wright1902Glider" wrote in message
...
Actually, I think a lifting fuselage comes under its own category...
lifting
body.
Historically, a flying wing aircraft is not only without a fuselage, it
is just
a wing. Its engines, cockpit, bomb bays, landing gear, etc. are all
contained
within the wing structure itself. That would include all of Northrop's
designs
(YB-49, B-2), most/all of Horten's, and just about every hang-glider
since
Francis Regallo. I would also clasify the ME-162 as a flying wing even
though
it is a little fat in its center section.
I'd call the F-106, Mirage, space shuttle, Concorde, etc. delta-winged
aircraft. Definately a triangular-shaped wing attached to a fuselage.
Now here's another question: are canard aircraft tailless? I can think
of
some that a Rutan EZ, Wright 1900 & 1901 gliders. I can also think
of some
that aren't: Rutan Voyager, Wright 1902-1908 Flyers.
Fun stuff,
Harry
|