Consistent CAP over a fleet from a land base
Leaving aside that afterburners without sufficient a fuel load are like
tail fins on a car, name a single theater in today's world order where
the A-10s would be moving mud without F-15s and F-16s having achieved
air superiority first.
"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message
oups.com...
KDR wrote:
Has any air force ever tried or practiced providing a consistent CAP
over a fleet by air-to-air refueling? I am wondering whether or not
RAF
Tornado F3 units had ever done that.
I am an avocate of adding afterburners to the A-10 for just this
reason. A long duration of coverage is the defensive role.
A five hour rotation is possible for the Warthog upgraded. A radar
targeted front cannon is real cool.
Mach 1.5 is possible even for the odd shape. And this is enough for
coverage air to air fighting. A short evasive is the basic missile
defense.
A basic airframe is perfect for the defensive role fighter.
|