View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 17th 04, 11:30 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
Brooks wrote:
It's just another Tarverbot troll. Get used to them, or make life much

more
simple by just killfiling him--nine out of ten RAM regulars can't be

wrong,

I keep him in the same file as Art although Tarver will listen to reason

once
in a while and will discuss items other than the Big War


Tarver listening to reason? The same Tarver who has repeatedly opined that
the F-106 was actually tasked to perform offensive nuclear strike missions,
that it carried AIM-7's and "optical nukes", that the M102 sitting in the
back of the AC-130 is a "recoiless rifle", alluded to a death threat against
another poster, said that the pitot tube was not important until the advent
of jet aircraft (and that the absence of same resulted in a whole danged
flock of early Navy jets pitching into the drink en mass), and that the side
doing the blockading during the Civil War was the *Confederate* Navy? Or are
you talking about *another* Tarvernaut? :-)

Brooks


Rick