View Single Post
  #1  
Old June 28th 04, 07:55 AM
Issac Goldberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default USS Liberty Challenge/Reward

ojunk (Mike Weeks) wrote:

http://libertyincident.com/documents.htm

Finally! After lots of name calling, changing the
subject and non sequiturs, Weeks gives a source
which he alleges contains information concerning
Congress investigating the Liberty and concluding
that the attack was an accident.

First, rather that 5 or 6 Congressional investigations,
there are only two alleged investigations into the USS
Liberty. But, as we will see, these two committees did
not conduct conclusive investigations into the major
points of controversy concerning the USS Liberty.

1) House Armed Services Committee Investigation

Lo and behold, rather than "A Report on the attack on the
USS Liberty," the link takes you to a report on "Review of
Department of Defense Worldwide Communications."

The only connection with the attack on the Liberty was
the misrouted message ordering the Liberty to leave the
area due to the hostilities. No other aspect of the
attack on the Liberty was looked at. The topics
not looked at included:

a) Whether the attack was intentional,

b) Whether Israel had previously identified
the Liberty,

c) Whether rescue aircraft were recalled,

d) Whether an American intelligence plane
recorded conversations between the attacking
Israeli aircraft and their controllers, and
what those conversations were.

In fact the only issue considered in the report
deals with problems with DOD communications.

If this is an example of what Cristol alleges was a
Congressional investigation of the Liberty which
exonerates the Israelis, Cristol is a failure.

2) Senate Foreign Relations Committee Investigation

Lo and behold, rather than "An Investigation into the
attack on the USS Liberty," the link takes you to
hearings on the "Foreign Assistance Act of 1967."

It is not a report giving conclusions of an
investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty;
it is merely hearings. They are two different things.

However, there are some comments by Senators which
indicate their feelings on the assault on the USS
Liberty:

Senator Hickenlooper: "I think it was a deliberate
assault on [the USS Liberty.] ... I think they had ample
opportunity to identify it as an American ship. ...
It is inconceivable to me that the ship could not
have been identified."

Senator Aiken: "I think, not only the committee, but the
public wants better information than they have had so far."

Senator Mundt also expresses doubts about the failure of
the attacking Israeli pilots to identify the ship "in
broad daylight."

So, based on the only three Senators who were quoted, the
conclusion of the Committee, if there had been a report,
would have been the rejection of the contention that
the attack was accidental.

If this is an example of what Cristol alleges was an
investigation of the Liberty which exonerates the
Israelis, Cristol is a failure.

Cristol is 0 for 2. Cristol is a failure.

There was no Congressional investigation of the
USS Liberty which concluded that the Israeli
attack was an accident. And this was from the
link that Weeks provided. Maybe Weeks will
continue to provide other links which disprove
his contentions.