"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Dan Rather forges ahead
From: "Jarg"
Date: 9/11/2004 5:32 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: m

"Bob Coe" wrote in message
news:%JM0d.23965$ni.13950@okepread01...


I just don't see how a person like Dan Rather could be so easily duped
by
these forgeries. They weren't even originals! Hell even I can cut out
someone's
signature and put it on any letter I want with just a Xerox machine.
Today
I would just use my scanner and add it to my MS Word document.



I give him the benefit of the doubt - he saw what he wanted to see.


No, I think Dan Rather was putting his reputation behind a known
forgery, to give it credence, and to hurt the Republican party. I hope
it now results in his finally being put out to pasture (which should
have
happened 10 years ago anyway). Same with the other scum-bags on
60 minutes, who are always making a mountain out of a mole hill.



I'm sure he has no qualms about hurting the Republican party, but I still
think it unlikely he knew.

Jarg

Nothing to know. These were the real thing. The rest is just the usual
Neocon
spin.


Hey, what's a neocon?