View Single Post
  #56  
Old May 7th 05, 02:22 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Galban" wrote in message
oups.com...

Dylan Smith wrote:
snip
In any case, it's a problem that cannot be ignored. It's not just

that
burning fossil fuels is adding CO2 to the atmosphere, it's:

* fossil fuels are not infinite, and indeed although there may be

enough
to outlast everyone alive today, the *cheap* oil is rather more
limited. Our current lifestyles don't just depend on oil, they

depend
on oil that is very cheap.
* we are having to depend on hostile nations for energy supply
* the damage will not be reversable, at least not in our lifetimes.


I agree wholeheartedly with your first two points. The economic and
political ramifications of relying on cheap oil are not good for
anyone. Of course, the way most economies work, alternatives will not
be exploited until the oil becomes more expensive than the alternative.


What you describe is a "market economy", which is rather UNCOMMON. More
common is a COMMAND economy.

I can easily see a day when oil at $500/bbl will result in everyone
flying high-tech solar powered airplanes (*note aviation content!*) and
heating their homes with solar supplied hydrogen. When oil is no
longer economically feasable, something cheaper will take its place.


Probably longgggg before oil becomes $500/bbl.