In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...

Does it? Yes, it mentions "via RUT VOR/DME" in the missed text, but
there aren't actually any fixes that use DME from RUT. The only DME
callout I see in the missed is GITEW, which is I-RUT 16.4.

I can't see any reason this approach wouldn't be flyable with the RUT
DME out of service, as long as the VOR azimuth was still operating.


I didn't say the procedure used DME information from RUT VOR/DME. The
navaid is called a VOR/DME. The missed approach procedure includes a climb
to 2600 via direct to the VOR/DME and then the 221 radial from it. You
can't do that if the navaid is out of service.



As long as the VOR portion is working, you can. The status of the DME
portion is immaterial to this approach.