View Single Post
  #12  
Old August 5th 03, 12:54 PM
Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8/5/03 6:24 AM, in article , "John
Carrier" wrote:

One problem with the current state of organic adversary is that it's almost
all similar aircraft. As the Navy transitions to an all F-18 force, it'd be
beneficial to face other airframes in training ... something other than a
VCF F-18.


John,

This is a shortcoming I had overlooked. It's especially valid when two
groups of two meet at the merge.


The A-4 makes a great BFM bogey, but it has its limitations as well. While
current doctrine discourages a merge to engage, it can happen. I'd like to
see an adversary that is a challenge to the effort to DISengage (Kfirs and
F-16s were formidable in that respect ... the A-4 wasn't). The Superbug has
a notable flaw in its inability to accelerate and leave a fight ... training
against other bugs or A-4's will not help the development of good tactical
technique in the most difficult of maneuvers.

My point is that ATSI doesn't seem to offer any fast movers (the Mig-29 ala
the novel would be nice) and the lack of such an aircraft would impact their
effectiveness. And the costs to train to and support such a jet are greater
than the A-4.


Concur. Good points all.

--Woody

R / John