View Single Post
  #26  
Old May 11th 08, 07:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
T.L. Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default The Swedish Model: How to build a jet fighter.

On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT), Douglas Eagleson
wrote:

If you can not do the two maneuvers stated, in a F-16 or F-22 you will
never beat the Griphen. The russian mig-30 that literally stops in mid
flight and recovers, is another example. A forward canard allows this.

It is a critical failure of US technology.


OTOH, the forward strakes of US aircraft are growing in size, either
to blend the fuselage/wing for stealth purposes (pioneered by the
SR-71), or for increased lift as in the F/A-18 as compared to the
original F-18. A large forward strake of adequate wing section would
serve the same purpose as a canard in a stall, movable or not, yes?

Or so it intuitively seems to an aeronautics newbie...

Of course, should the Su-35/Su-37 be produced in large enough
numbers, canards will be the least of our problems. Sure, the canards
help, but jet nozzles on gimbals trump their contribution.

T.L. Davis