Thread: Sukhoi PAK-FA ?
View Single Post
  #24  
Old February 17th 05, 10:09 PM
Keith W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"forties" wrote in message
ups.com...
Soviet Fulcrum-A's or C's with their 1980-vintage equipment are more a

match
to F-16A's (that's the SMT upgrade is for, but there is no money).


And Fulcrums are superior than F-16* in all modifications by all
factors- be honest.


The combat record suggests otherwise, as does the fact that
the Germans retired their Fulcrum's


About the
MiG-31 fuel bills-well, T-6 is not JP-7 (if it is T-6 at all), and

MiG-31's
replaced Tu-128's, the lagest fighters/interceptors ever used in

operational
service!


Mig-31 replaced Mig-25.. Mig-31/Tu-128 replacement - is profanation..
like b-2 replaced b-29 largest US bomber..

Maintenance is the problem, not fuel. I haven't herd about the
latest BM conversions.


Maintanance of SR-71 is also a problem.. as well as for any a/c reaches
M3+. Agree?


Maintenance of the SR-71 is no problem at all, the aircraft
went out of service years ago.

Keith