View Single Post
  #20  
Old March 3rd 04, 06:50 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:27:16 GMT, (Grantland)
wrote:

Ed Rasimus wrote:

In Iraq, we saw this weekend the acceptance of an interim constitution
with compromise between Sunni and Shi'ite factions on a government.
The insurgents continue to cause damage, but they harm their nation's
people much more than the US forces and beyond the liberals in
America, the ones that are suffering and recognizing them for what
they are will be the people of a free and democratic Iraq.

Ex post facto rationalization for a stupid blunder at the instigation
of obvious traitors. Enjoy your false and absurdly expensive phoney
moral gratification, stupid slave.

Grantland


You've demonstrated extensive vocabulary, but poor rationale. You've
contributed little to the discussion, but it's nice to see you're
participating.

I'm no one's slave. I don't have the slightest clue what your comment
relates to, but by position can only assume that you're talking about
the last paragraph. How a prediction of political reaction to the
insurgent's random terrorist attacks can be "ex post facto" escapes
me. Rationale (or rationalization) is usually going to be expressed
after events.


Rational thought in and of itself is completely foreign to Grantland, Ed.
Extreme racism *is* however one of his more common traits. Arguing with him
is futile; plonking him will not result in your missing discourse of any
import.

Brooks

snip