View Single Post
  #6  
Old April 12th 04, 04:43 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:28:47 -0700, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Mark" wrote in message
.com...
Would have to do a little research on this one, but I'll start with a
guess...

The interface with the aircraft may have changed from a 'vanilla' missile
umbilical to the more advanced 1760 interface (such as used with AIM-120).
The internal aircraft wiring associated with the 'smart' interface may

have
not been accounted for in the initial design (the short-range missile bays
were dedicated to the AIM-9). That said, I'd be surprised that the "Group
A" provisions (wiring) was not included as a 'hedge' against down the road
changes such as this one...

Another aspect to all of this could be the associated software code for
proper interface between aircraft and missile and calculation/display of
in/out of missile engagement zone for the missile.

Since I saw the post thought I'd offer up some possibilities, subject to
major correction of course by someone who knows something for sure....


It all reminds me of the Twilight Zone episode where the conductor walks
down the aisle calling, "Willoughby, next stop Willoughby ...".



I imagine you're quite familiar with that.