La N wrote:
"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:42:51 GMT, "La N"
wrote:

"Vince" wrote in message
news La N wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove
underscore) wrote in message
...

You said something dumb - then myself and red started
making fun of you by - using standardized logistics
terminology that you did not understand.


Well, Vince, if nothing else, you can bust Colin on very bad
grammar ...

- nilita
he does not know the difference between supply and logistics so
the case is closed

Well, it has been an "interesting" debate between 2 people, each
of whom has never been known to admit when they have been wrong
...%)

That is not a fair accusation when aimed at Vince.


Well, maybe it's because he's never been wrong? ..

He has never declared himself to be at the losing end of an argument,
so I guess, then, that Vince is always right? I like Vince, but he
*does* - like so many people - have an ego that prevents him from
saying something to the effect of, "Okay, we'll just have to agree to
disagree on that." He is always right, and the other person is
always wrong.

- nilita


I am often wrong. I can't spell and my "than and then" is shaky.
On inferences I am always willing to agree to disagree

In my syllabus it states

"Participation points are not given for merely answering questions.
Participation points are awarded for special contribution to
discussions, especially sticking your neck out to argue the logic of a
class topic with me. Pointing out a significant error in my logic or
facts gets extra credit."

My engineers delight in catching me in a technical error
They get credit for it.


Vince















..