"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"Kevin Brooks" wrote:

snip

Basically, everything you've said so far has been "it's not possible to
do with a bigger dam because, well, technology hasn't advanced enough
over the last *60 years*, and nobody would do a one-way mission even
though it would be a really major hit on the Chinese, and enough of a
deterrent to keep them from attacking Taiwan."

One last time, where are those specific dimensions you keep claiming to
have, but can never produce (while going out of your way to attack the only
rough estimates so far concocted)? Keep on designing that nifty shaped
charge warhead of your's, Chad... you have proven to be about as full of hot
air, and afraid to present your supposed 'real' data, as the Tarvernaut.

Brooks


--
cirby at cfl.rr.com