View Single Post
  #28  
Old February 13th 05, 04:28 AM
Jon A.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:10:47 GMT, "Dan Thompson"
wrote:

An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the
manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated.

Or a 337 with and STC is used.

Or a field approval is obtained.

Holy Crap! Someone else that reads the entire passage, not just what
they want to see! Hope you have your armor on. The pseudo lawyers
are going to get you!


"Jon A." wrote in message
news
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote:

The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't.

Jim



"Javier Henderson" wrote in message
...
Jon A. writes:

Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured
parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving
it to be true?

What myth is this?

-jav

No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on
his own.