View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 9th 05, 01:50 AM
KENG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ouch, I'm wounded. I work in the AV8B program now , and I just found out
today, that I'm going to transition over to the V22 program.

Tiger wrote:

wrote:

Thanks for remembering that.

Just for comparison. F/A-18 Hornet: first flight in 1978, operational
since mid 1980s, modernized versions appearing in late 1980s/early
1990s, now entering service the next generations of this plane. Often
criticized as "too average plane", but on schedule, on costs, and
available for service.

V-22 Osprey: a great idea, but for years "permanently under
development", still eating money and taking lives, whereas CH-46 and
CH-53 to be replaced by it have to fly on the wings of prayers of
maintainers and aviators.

Is that really a good direction?;-)

Best regards,

Jacek



There have been planes in the past alot worse than the V-22. Both in
money & lives dept. Many said the same about the F4U or the AV8 Harrier.