"Mike Borgelt" wrote in message
But the 26 is the only one with blow turbulators and it goes no better
than the two gliders without. I think you just made my point.

Mike



So how's that prove BHs are ineffective? One could also say the 26e design
is somehow otherwise aerodynamically slightly inferior to the other gliders
mentioned. And that the BHs make up for this by bringing the 26's
performance up to par. Not saying I really buy this, but it makes about as
much sense.

I suspect blow turbulators provide a slight incremental improvement and
other manufactures don't think the gain justifies expense. Either way, it
doesn't much matter to me . . . they're on my 26e and they are way cool. To
those less fortunate "blowholeless pilots", I say, "tough"!

--
bumper
"Dare to be different . . . circle in sink."
to reply, the last half is right to left






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 6/30/2003