View Single Post
  #27  
Old April 28th 20, 10:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 148
Default Minimum acceptable self-launch climb rate

On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 10:25:27 AM UTC-7, Eric Greenwell wrote:
wrote on 4/28/2020 8:16 AM:

The typical slow self launch climbout speed arguably makes a self launch more hazardous than an aerotow or a winch launch until above 500ft, which takes a couple of minutes. The climb speed is lower than the typical approach speed, and the speed would drop fast, due to the nose up attitude, the flap use for climb, and the sudden windmill drag, which will try to increase the pitch-up for a mast design. I find it best to approach at Minden in my ventus 2cxM at a speed much higher than the climbout speed: I approach at 70kts in summer, due to the typical changeable, windy conditions, only slowing in the last 50ft.

My experience is much different than yours. I think self-launch in my ASH26E is
safer than towing or winch, because I am in complete control. There is no chance
miscommunication, no chance of entanglement with a rope or parachute, no need to
fly formation or operate at a very high pitch attitude.

At the places I fly, I can land straight ahead from less than 100' agl, and do a
180 back to the runway over 200' agl - the same numbers I would use for a typical
tow. At 600 fpm climb, that's only 10 seconds of "aw snap!" if the engine stops
between 100' and 200', same as for a tow. If the engine quits (never has), I will
just nose down to keep the speed correct, then use my pre-determined plan for the
situation, same as if I was being towed. I've practiced this at altitude, examined
the IGC file, so I'm confident it would work as well as it would with a tow failure.

I've flown at Minden, Ely, and Parowan many times over 25 years with the 26E, and
never had a problem with handling turbulence on takeoff; I do land as you do in
the often much more turbulent afternoon.


--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me)
- "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation"
https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1


Hi Eric, your points are all true, and on balance I prefer a motorglider. But just not for the first minute of takeoff. Although I don't feel personally endangered, an engine failure would probably force me to sacrifice my motorglider to preserve my safety. From 200ft, starting nose up at best climb speed (51-54kts), flaps +2 and engine windmilling, I very much doubt I could do a safe 180 in my glider (Ventus 2cxm). I've I've never dared try it, and I've never heard of anyone trying it. In contrast, simulated aerotow failures from 200ft in gliders is practiced as part of standard training. Similarly, a winch failure at any time should be able to be safely handled.