In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

(snipped)

With your comment above, you are obiviously associating 9/11 Truth with
silly conspiracy theories. Doing this is a predetermination of where
you're beliefs will be. You cannot argue with science. And if you dispute
it, you obviously didn't look into it


*WE* are not arguing with science! It is "TRUTH" who is and is losing --
badly!

1) "TRUTH" posits a crackpot professor's idea and claims that it has
been peer reviewed. It has -- but the good professor's peers reject the
story.

2) "TRUTH" posts in aviation newsgroups seeking validation for his (or
some other crackpot's) contention that the hijackers couldn't have flown
the 757s into the buildings and gets 100% response that they could have
done it.

3) "TRUTH" posits that no plane struck the Pentagon -- Purdue University
shows the complete engineering analysis of what happened when the lane
hit the Pentagon.

It is time for "TRUTH", "EagleEye", "Emmanuel Goldstein" and all the
rest of their ilk to go away and hide in their caves in Afghanistan,
with their buddies bin Laden and Zawahiri and await the next B-1 full of
deep penetrators which they all richly deserve.