At OLM, there are LOC minima; at AST, the approach is NA if the glideslope
is inoperative, which wipes out any chance of a LOC approach. I would guess
that the localizers ARE monitored, because in doing some other research I
ran across the ILS at Galesburg, IL, where the ILS is NA as an alternate
because the localizer is not monitored.

BTW, e-mails to the address in your header bounce.

Bob Gardner

"Snowbird" wrote in message
om...
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
news:hv17b.288320$cF.89187@rwcrnsc53...
I don't make the rules (g). The LOM is not required for the miss at
either
OLM or AST, but I think it is significant that neither ILS is approved
as an
alternate and both LOMs are unmonitored.

Are the LOC's monitored?

Bob, what happens to the ILS minimums if the LOM is OTS?

No change?

Thanks,
Sydney