"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:57:31 +0100, "Keith Willshaw"
wrote:


Only if it were still functional after the initial explosion, given
the
scale of the damage done by what was to all intents a 50 ton
FAE thats unlikely. The issue is moot however since the major
damage was done by the initial explosion

I doubt there'd have been an explosion of anythihg like that
magnitude.

There was , read the bloody report.

??????? There was? this is a sequence that did *not* happen. You
might argue that there would have been, but what you typed is
nonsense.


From the report

"Approximately 50 tons of cyclohexane was released, mixed with air, and
exploded"


A lot of material had to leak fast.

It did, , read the bloody report.

See above


I repeat from the report
"Approximately 50 tons of cyclohexane was released, mixed with air, and
exploded"

Are you going to turn into Tarver now ?

Continually denying that a large explosion occurred
is not smart given the incontrovertible evidence that
it did.

Keith




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---