View Single Post
  #20  
Old February 20th 07, 02:14 AM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Defendario
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

David E. Powell wrote:
On Feb 12, 7:34 pm, Defendario wrote:
Michael Wise wrote:
In article ,
Defendario wrote:
Michael Wise wrote:
In article ,
"David Nicholls" wrote:
The mid-east is already nuclear (Isreal) - it is the appearance of a
balance
that appears to worry the US.
That and the fact that officials in the Iranian government (from the top
down) have repeatedly made public comments that various countries (such
as Israel) should be wiped off the map.
You make that sound like a *bad* thing...
Are you saying that the guaranteed nuclear counter response and
resulting regional death, destruction, and nuclear fallout around the
world are good things?

Iran will recover, but IsReeL will not.


Um... how will Iran recover if there is a nuclear counter strike? They
don't just "repopulate" like a MUD computer game. You are talking
about millions of deaths here.


Iran is a big country. They can withstand a strike much more robustly
than can Little****tystan, which will be destroyed by non-nuke WMD

And that, of course, would be a *good* *thing*


Only if you are a keyboard commando who gets off on the idea of
nuclear holocausts, with zero empathy for anyone who would be caught
in one, or ability to comprehend that the fighting and/or radiation
and killing could spread to the very place you sit right now.


Then if you are such an advocate of peace, support the removal of the
dangerous and militaristic Bushler Cabal who hold the levers of power.

Touch Persia, death to IsReeL

Peace = survival

Choose wisely