"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
. ..

This was updated, and re-emphasized in 2005. Read this:

http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pi...05/pc0508.html

In a case not noted in either source, the NTSB referred to pilot reports
as "anectodal evidence" and said that pilots had to rely on government
reports, period. This 2005 case gives pilot reports a little more slack.

For those of us who can't get to the linked article, if that refers to NTSB
opinions from 2005, would you cite the Order no.s please?

Thanks

Julian