if the logbook says a 100hr inspection was completed IAW the maint manual..
then only what is in the maint manual for a 100hr inspection counts.. the
seals were not logged as replaced, so it did not happen...

if the 100hr inspection entry makes reference to a "work order number", then
a copy of that work order should be with the maint logs... if you as the
owner do not have a copy of the work order, from your receipt of payment for
services.. that is your problem.. as far a buyer or insurance rep would
say... if it is not in the log books , it did not happen and it would
devalue your aircraft.

BT

"Peter" wrote in message
...

"Denny" wrote

N registered aircraft are required to have all work recorded in the
airframe and powerplant logs, what you apparently call maintenance
records... I have no idea why you would think otherwise... My 1957
Apache came with an armload of logbooks going back to day one... In
this country a plane that does not have a complete set of logbooks
suffers a significant drop in the value of the aircraft...

Logbooks yes. I have the logbooks. But logbooks don't contain the
*details* of work done. They should contain references to other
documents. For example a logbook might say that a 100hr check was
done. What it won't say (unless the engineer felt like writing it in
there) is that the landing gear gas seals had to be replaced and two
instrument panel light had to be replaced, etc; that will be in a
separate file which is referenced in the logbook.

My question was whether *** under FAA rules *** the aircraft owner is
entitled to have a copy of these separate files. I have just been
advised by email from someone who I know should know that the
maintenance firm *is* required by the FAA to keep copies, so if they
do hand the originals over they are allowed to make a reasonable
charge for copying.

One of the problems with purchasing a second user aircraft is that
even if all the logbooks are present, there is no record of what might
have been a very long string of minor rectification work, especially
if some of the various maintenance firms involved have gone bust.


Peter.
--
Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.
E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y.
Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary.