View Single Post
  #40  
Old December 15th 19, 11:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default Tesla Model 3 and a glider

Ah...Â* Someone previously mentioned getting about 50% back going down a
hill from what he used going up.Â* I'm sure that's variable, too.

I think these electric cars are terrific and, for a lot of folks, work
out great.Â* But, for me and others who live out in the wilderness, they
just can't /_yet_/ compete with gasoline or diesel over the spectrum of
use.Â* There will come a day, however, when the state of the art will
announce the demise of internal combustion engines.Â* I hope I'm around
to see it.

On 12/15/2019 4:26 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 15:54:44 -0700, Dan Marotta wrote:

Regenerative braking does work but, like other things in life, there's
no free lunch.Â* There are losses (heat, friction, induction, hysteresis)
in any system, electrical or mechanical, so you don't recoup all you
spent going up hill by going down hill.

Yes,I understand that (Chemistry degree, so allegedly I have/had a decent
grasp on basic physics). So, I understand that you don't get back all the
energy spent in getting higher when you come down again.

What I don't understand is what proportion of that energy you get back,
given the current state of automotive engineering. This is why I'm asking
questions about it.



--
Dan, 5J