"darwin smith" wrote in message
hlink.net...

It was a question asked in such a way as to imply that the "answer"
was completely
obvious - there is no fight against gay marraige.


There isn't. Gays marry regularly and have done so for quite some time.



I therefore treated
the comment as
a statement being expressed in the form of a rhetorical question.

Now, I would guess that to you the answer to your "question" is
perfectly obvious -
there is no fight against gay marriage. If this is so, then could you
please explain to me
why the Republican efforts in Massachussetts to ban same-sex unions, and
"Bush the
Lesser's" proposed constitutional amendment are not "fights against gay
marriage"/


Gay marriage is not the same as same-sex marriage.



I disagree, obviously, but as I say below I can understand your view.


All abortion procedures performed today cause the deliberate death of the
child. That is murder by any reasonable definition.



Even when there is no exception to save the life of the mother?

By the way, I see that you didn't bother to address my comments about
birth control,
sex education, and generally being around when Suzy really needs the
help. Let me
know when you're ready and willing to discuss the _complete_ topic of
abortion,
and have moved beyond just casting judgement on those who happen to
disagree
with you.


Those things are not abortion procedures. We were discussing abortion
procedures.