On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:38 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

§ñühwØ£f wrote in
news
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:26:50 +0000, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

§ñühw¤£f wrote in news:g2hiji$inn$7
@registered.motzarella.org:

Max Isn't Well luv2^fly99@live.^com
:

In article , §ñühwØ£f
says...

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:03:09 +0000, TransWench wrote:

I was busily flonking away in talk.politics.guns,
alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,
rec.crafts.metalworking,
misc.survivalism, and alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris
Herself
suddenly made me reply to ZeD:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:44:09 -0700, Max Isn't Well wrote:
Aratzio says...
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:03:51 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
"RD (The Sandman)" got double secret probation for writing:
Aratzio wrote:
biggus snippus
I don't think there is a right to own an assault weapon.

I don't think you know what an assault weapon is. It is a
media term
used to describe *semi* auto military look alikes. They
fire
a
medium powered round one shot at a time just like a
revolver.
Now,
if you wish to use the term "assault rifle" that is an
actual
term
that describes *full* auto capable weaponry like what is
actually
used by the military. Full auto weaponry has been controlled
by
federal law since 1934. Ownership of full auto is banned in
some
states. The media also uses this term incorrectly in
describing what
are assault "weapons".

Specific
types of military grade weapons should be tightly
controlled.

They are.....like since 1934.

And demonstrates that controlling specific types of weapons
is
legal.

'Legal' but unconstitutional. The second amendment does NOT
specify
semi-automatic arms or even small arms.

The purpose of the second amendment being to provide the
citizenry with
protection from the government, I an entitled to any weapon
they
have.

That's a fact. The anti gun nuts must think they have nothing
to
fear
from their government.

I'm still waiting for you gun nuts to actually *do something*
about the
foaming-at-the-mouth government you now have...At the rate
you're
"mobilising", I figure you should be ready to move a week or two
after
Way Too ****ing Late.

Yep, it'll happen the First of Never. The gubamint dosent care if
merikins
have guns since they know that the military could crush any
"revolution"
that might happen. its a false sense of freedums that merikins
share. Like
the idea that their vote actually counts

The last American whose vote actually counted was Lee Harvey Oswald

blink
I dont think a slug counts as a "vote".


in a lot of the world it certainly does!


Bertie

You've been spending too much time in Myanmar...



Well, i have spent a lot of time in the third world, and election time
in a lot of it means a coup, but the so-called first world is often
about three weeks from martial law. I'm still astonished as to how few
repercussions did arise form 9-11, in fact.

Your ideas interest me. Elaborate.

Some other nations that look
entirely stable are less so than one might imagine, IMO. I'm not gonna
worry, though!

Bertie

It wont get you cheeper gas, thats for sure.

--
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/09/...-against-bush/